| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Samsung R530/R730 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG R530/R730 |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100927 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 10 '20 at 14:12 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.3%
Average
|
41% 61 Pts
|
11% 79.1 Pts
|
5% 75.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Sanyo(144D C06D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52
|
1.35%
Terrible
|
1% 1.57 fps
|
2% 2.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 222 218 221 228 225 MB/s
|
56%
Above average
|
44% 196 MB/s
|
91% 34 MB/s
|
102% 136 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
2GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 19 18 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
28% 22 MB/s
|
124% 2.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.2%
Very poor
|
17% 6.1 GB/s
|
14% 5.03 GB/s
|
41% 97.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical R530/R730 Builds (Compare 80 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung R530/R730
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium T4500IntelBench 34%, 8,800 samples | 17x |
| Pentium T4400Intel $110Bench 34%, 7,903 samples | 15x |
| Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 41x |
| GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples | 29x |
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |