Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y31 112 User benchmarks, average bench 38% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 55.3 1-Core 77.4 2-Core 116 49% 83 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 173 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Apple(106B 013E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 7 Parallax 6.44 4% 6.17 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 4.37 Splatting 10.1 6% 7.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.81 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 298 Write 309 Mixed 280 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 8.9 34% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 462 DQ Write 59.3 DQ Mixed 180 152% 234 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E4350544D4C42522D4E5444 2x4GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 14.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	28x

SSD
APPLE SSD AP0256 251GBAppleBench 55%, 61 samples	14x
APPLE SSD AP0512 500GBAppleBench 57%, 54 samples	14x

RAM
0x483943434E4E4E4350544D4C42522D4E5444 2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 72 samples	19x
0x4544464231363441314D412D47442D462020 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 56 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16