HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory8.7 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 01:33
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5672
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 83
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 344
38% 300 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D8) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 56.2
48% 57.9 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 58.9
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sata SSD 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 53 24 34 28 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 131
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 42.3
14% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 36.5
4K Mixed 19
48% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.4
DQ Write 23.5
DQ Mixed 15.1
23% 46 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000NM0001 1TB
127GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 91 58 101 83 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 118
Write 109
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 83.5
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51272BA1339.M18F ID:85 F7 F6451U67F1600G ID:01 98 9965525-008.A00LF ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 50GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback