Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E1500 322 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 48.5 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 48.6 27% 40.6 Pts	4-Core 48.9 8-Core 46.8 6% 47.8 Pts	64-Core 49.8 3% 49.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% BFG(19F1 10F8) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.8% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.28 1% 0.71 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.8% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 55 45 55 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 40.7 Write 22.4 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 48.1 29% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 58%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 109GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 56 46 56 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 50.8 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 49.8 34% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.8 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16