Asus N55SF

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus N55SF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N55SF
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 08 '20 at 19:21
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 144 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 315 35% 275 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M 4,170 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 2050) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 7.58 Parallax 5.16 5% 6.41 fps	MRender 8.19 Gravity 6.47 Splatting 8.04 6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521A SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 146 160 155 158 137 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.1% Good	Read 283 Write 203 Mixed 239 SusWrite 154 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 30 104% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 82.6 89% 148 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 87%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 260GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 97 87 92 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 71.3 Write 98.4 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 91.3 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N55SF Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N55SF

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	114x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	31x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	28x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	121x
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	72x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	4x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Ultra II 960GBSanDisk $226Bench 85%, 35,454 samples	5x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	34x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	24x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16