Asrock HM77-MXM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock HM77-MXM  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 21:20
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 478
52% 410 Pts
64-Core 476
29% 476 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7800M
AMD(1002 031E) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 15.2
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 11
Splatting 13.8
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-arc1 00 480GB
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 373 418 373 439 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 397
Write 435
Mixed 307
SusWrite 400
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 29.7
102% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 224
192% 282 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KB8G_D3_SO1600CL10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback