PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A98h |
Memory | 16.8 GB free of 20.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20081015 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 07 '20 at 20:33 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5440
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
|
46.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
85.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 242 249 250 250 250 MB/s
|
73.6%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
259GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 104 104 104 MB/s
|
59.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 53GB
null MHz
4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 33792 MB
|
20.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples | 17x |
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $153 |