PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (all builds) |
Memory | 24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180315 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 07 '20 at 18:01 |
Run Duration | 338 Seconds |
Run User | ARE-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.6%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 382 244 106 103 97 MB/s
|
82.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 12TB (2017)-$150
27GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 148 140 127 148 149 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 81 77 74 74 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
23GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 90 97 93 91 94 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
0GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB
144GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 80 79 72 71 78 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
126GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 80 79 72 71 78 MB/s
|
32%
Below average
|
|||
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
9GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 79 78 71 69 77 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 2TB
128GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 78 79 77 79 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
Generic Flash Disk 64GB
58GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 3.7 3.7 6 5 7.2 MB/s
|
2.14%
Terrible
|
|||
Generic MassStorageClass 253GB
235GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 25 25 24 21 16 MB/s
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 111 71 87 112 MB/s
|
50.2%
Above average
|
|||
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
819GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 85 111 72 86 112 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 36 37 36 37 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic MassStorageClass 250GB
180GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 54 62 58 55 MB/s
|
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
68.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 4,554x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 843x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 597x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 990x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 892x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 470x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $972 |