Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '20 at 11:02
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$52 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 217 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 430 56% 424 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Nvidia(10DE 17C8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 115 Parallax 103 90% 109 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 98.6 Splatting 86 76% 93.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 155 147 138 141 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 469 Write 351 Mixed 295 SusWrite 162 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 42.2 159% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 227 177% 242 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 181GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 91 90 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 83.5 Write 88 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 90.5 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB 3,888 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 18.7 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DGS R2.0 - $21

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	190x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	139x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	118x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	76x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	63x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	45x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	28x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16