Lenovo 3212AP2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 3212AP2 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	15.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121015
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	May 07 '20 at 00:20
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 58.1 2-Core 173 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 466 46% 377 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$37 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 56 24 14 156 115 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 220 Write 214 Mixed 165 SusWrite 94.4 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 17.7 60% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 76.7 DQ Mixed 40 44% 76 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 55%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 299GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 41 42 37 49 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 76.2 Write 93 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 44.6 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 65% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 86%
WD WD20NPVZ-00WFZT0 1TB 228GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 56 57 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 50.9 Write 50.8 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 56.4 36% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 126% 0.73 MB/s

WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 560GB free, PID 10a8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 93 93 93 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 105 Write 92 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 92.3 106% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 43%
WD Elements 25A2 750GB 1,458 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 279GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 87 86 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 87.3 Write 84 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 86.2 95% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD38G13332 04CB 04CB Kingston 99U5474-038.A00LF 20GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 3212AP2

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)