Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 788
83% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.5% Very good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 63.9
71% 76.9 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 89.6
Splatting 77.9
73% 91 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 205 196 201 201 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 327
Write 247
Mixed 162
SusWrite 197
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 37.4
121% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 197
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72%
Great: 119%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
26GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 70 59 60 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 408
Write 173
Mixed 228
SusWrite 66.8
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 38
129% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 105
96% 149 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 116%
WD My Passport 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 104 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 107
130% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 33.3
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback