Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 21:44
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 35
2-Core 88.2
43% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 95.8
8-Core 151
15% 124 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1593 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 43.8
39% 46.5 fps
MRender 45.3
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 39.3
35% 42.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 102 37 31 31 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 499
Write 482
Mixed 315
SusWrite 77.5
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 40.5
152% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 179
164% 253 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
224GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 188 193 193 191 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 151
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 187
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 8.3 8.3 7.7 8.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 8
9% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 0423 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 12.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback