Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100908
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 21:03
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 91.8
49% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 158
17% 134 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 113
Parallax 130
82% 115 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 109
Splatting 99.6
101% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 58 50 50 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64% Good
Read 391
Write 373
Mixed 316
SusWrite 56
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 39.1
135% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 93.6
DQ Mixed 46.3
41% 59.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
137GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 120 123 128 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 199
Write 358
Mixed 305
SusWrite 123
56% 246 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 37.2
123% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.4
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 46.2
37% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 120 123 128 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 92.5
Write 121
Mixed 55
SusWrite 123
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
246% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
125GB free
Firmware: 3.ADG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 58 50 50 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 60.7
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 58
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
75GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 57
Write 26.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 47.1
32% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 40%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Read 13
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 10.7
10% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.7
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $446
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback