Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 53.1 1-Core 14.5 2-Core 31.8 25% 33.1 Pts	4-Core 33.8 8-Core 32 4% 32.9 Pts	64-Core 32.6 2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C589) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.94% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.44 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.94% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 105 131 136 138 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 198 Write 149 Mixed 136 SusWrite 126 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 7.2 28% 8.8 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 59.7 47% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Adata AD73I1C1674EV 8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 3.7 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 13%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

SSD
N18A 480GBSSDBench 71%, 72 samples	9x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	13x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GBSamsungBench 25%, 274 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16