Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '20 at 16:51
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 91.4 1-Core 131 2-Core 258 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 511 66% 500 Pts	64-Core 520 32% 520 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.4 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Lighting 60.9 Reflection 65 Parallax 79.3 50% 68.4 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 54 Splatting 53.5 46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G32TNF-N3A0A 256GB 1,183 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: 70000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 315 263 264 265 264 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 443 Mixed 419 SusWrite 286 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 49.7 175% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 321 248% 340 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 100%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 4GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 13 14 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 117 Write 26 Mixed 8.9 SusWrite 12.6 38% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 41% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x8GB 4,421 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 11.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	225x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	204x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	36x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	26x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	22x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $320

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16