Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Toshiba dynabook T552/58FWM (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344 2,187 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 164 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 420 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB20) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Lighting 5.03 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 3.44 4% 5.03 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 2.77 Splatting 9.52 6% 6.46 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 102 104 100 102 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 316 Write 121 Mixed 246 SusWrite 126 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 26.2 96% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 198 170% 246 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	57% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 18.2 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16