Lenovo 12992DU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 12992DU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torpedo
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '17 at 08:38
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A8-3510MX APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
27.8% Poor
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 85.4
31% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 146
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 147
10% 147 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Legend(17AA 3971) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 11.2
3% 12 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 9
Splatting 10.4
3% 9.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PB22-JS3 FDE 2.5" 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VBM9LD1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 145
Write 2.96
Mixed 7.99
11% 52 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 6.48
4K Mixed 5.93
28% 7.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMT3020EC58E9F133 RMT3160ED58E9W160 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 12992DU Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 12992DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $137Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback