Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR) 4,762 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 54.1 2-Core 86.1 42% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 84.2 8-Core 78.5 11% 81.3 Pts	64-Core 85.9 5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 121E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 5.92 Parallax 4.34 3% 4.52 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 3.33 Splatting 4.39 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 125 126 113 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 441 Write 127 Mixed 156 SusWrite 122 46% 212 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 18.7 74% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 116 96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 12GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2400, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	24x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	2x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	1x

RAM
K4A4G085WE-BCPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 21%, 388 samples	8x
MT40A512M8RH-083E:B 1x4GBMicronBench 21%, 272 samples	5x
K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 22%, 816 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16