Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '17 at 17:35
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 73.2
34% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 92.6
18% 124 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 36%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 492
Write 180
Mixed 262
68% 311 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 20.8
78% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 68.2
70% 116 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
96GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 511
Write 151
Mixed 219
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 11.9
70% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 40.3
61% 116 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 82%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 135
Mixed 129
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.27
97% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 84%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
178GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60% Good
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 90.2
75% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.52
140% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60%
Great: 69%
WD WD1200JD-00HBC0 120GB
86GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 37.6
Write 52.5
Mixed 46.2
34% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.36
87% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 32%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
77GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 49.2
Mixed 59.8
43% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 57%
TOSHIBA MK6475GSX 640GB
595GB free, PID 0519
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 38.3
Mixed 6.44
32% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
18% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 18.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $457
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback