Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0D881F
Memory38.3 GB free of 44 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 08:47
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 594
56% 467 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 165
Parallax 146
117% 152 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 149
Splatting 122
109% 134 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 156 97 95 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 476
Write 471
Mixed 412
SusWrite 180
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 41.5
134% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 203
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
192GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67% Good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 111
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 67%
Great: 60%
Msft Virtual Disk 34GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 170
Write 177
Mixed 122
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.4
345% 3 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 63%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 66 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 167
Write 178
Mixed 123
SusWrite 65.6
175% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.3
240% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 86%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
75GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 86.6
Write 89.8
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 71.9
106% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
449GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 67 70 74 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 84.6
Write 87.5
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 68.5
102% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback