Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 168 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 350 40% 314 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 128GB 663 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM12D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 203 205 204 213 215 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.7% Average	Read 233 Write 212 Mixed 176 SusWrite 208 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 15.9 51% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 110 87% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 68%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87 21,339 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 100GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 59 59 59 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 71 Mixed 50 SusWrite 59 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G4M1 4x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 14.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16