PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 65.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Ah |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 03 '20 at 06:41 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
65.9%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 133 133 122 131 MB/s
|
75%
Very good
|
|||
ST330006 50NS 3TB
656GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 388x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 73x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 60x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 285x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 65x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 56x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 30x |
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 18x |
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |