Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '17 at 03:44
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 141
60% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 437
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Lighting 50.8
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 41.3
41% 46.5 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 38.3
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 4+0 Stripe/RAID0 356GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.4% Outstanding
Read 833
Write 361
Mixed 501
124% 565 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 23.6
129% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 59.9
66% 110 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 99%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
236GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 103
Write 112
Mixed 77.2
73% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.89
4K Mixed 0.59
152% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 69%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 126GB
113GB free, PID 00b2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 134
Write 35.6
Mixed 37.6
69% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.54
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 1.58
166% 4.16 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 50%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
63GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 8.96
Mixed 21.8
23% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.17
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.77
72% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 113%
7GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 231
Write 20.8
Mixed 31.5
79% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
71% 6.32 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback