Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200108
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 03 '20 at 04:18
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 77.2 1-Core 56 2-Core 105 50% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 334 32% 265 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 13B1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Lighting 30.2 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 28.5 25% 27.3 fps	MRender 30.7 Gravity 30.5 Splatting 21.9 22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB 3,002 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 376 381 374 385 398 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 690 Write 926 Mixed 660 SusWrite 398 151% 668 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 34.5 115% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 497 DQ Write 411 DQ Mixed 456 341% 455 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 179%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 870GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 136 135 131 137 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 94.2 Write 103 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 135 70% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.5 212% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 96,646 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 85.8 47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	466x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	274x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	413x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	327x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	63x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	60x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	59x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	217x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	97x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	41x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16