Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 57.6 31% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 77.8 8-Core 115 12% 96.6 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics 8,935 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 5.75 2% 4.14 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 8.35 5% 6.08 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDHTNG-8310A 256GB 4,680 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80060C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 304 303 310 301 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 647 Write 304 Mixed 313 SusWrite 301 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 22.7 78% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 224 172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 148%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 18 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 7.4 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 Mobile GraphicsAMDBench 8%, 8,935 samples	105x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	78x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples	60x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GBSamsungBench 56%, 2,711 samples	26x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	20x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16