Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Memory 15.3 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 61.4 21% 38.3 Pts	4-Core 68.6 8-Core 58.8 9% 63.7 Pts	64-Core 45.1 3% 45.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.16 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 2.57 2% 1.96 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 16,522 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 359GB free Firmware: SBFMKA.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 133 106 146 176 185 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 160 Write 174 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 152 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 18.3 53% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 88.7 DQ Write 82.9 DQ Mixed 71.3 58% 81 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB 419 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2 of 3 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 357 11% 357 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	2x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x1.5GBABCDBench 16%, 419 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16