Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5400-$75 14,795 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Memory 66.6 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 74.4 39% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 74 8-Core 71.6 10% 72.8 Pts	64-Core 73.3 4% 73.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.29 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.74 1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP3OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 41 53 60 66 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 82.6 Write 108 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 55 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 339GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 44 53 61 67 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 90.4 Write 97.5 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 56.3 56% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB 3,211 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16