Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160411
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '17 at 21:50
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 268 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 196 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 780 70% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,109 69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78% Very good	Lighting 100 Reflection 107 Parallax 97.6 82% 102 fps	MRender 91.6 Gravity 93.3 Splatting 78.7 71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 925GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1171 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 90 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 63 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 55009172	78.8% Very good	Read 507 Write 365 Mixed 425 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 23 80% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 122 128% 213 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 644GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2738 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 122 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1726920111	86% Excellent	Read 505 Write 380 Mixed 424 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 25 101% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 105 124% 215 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 133%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEDMW80 800GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 625GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,777 Write 794 Mixed 1,197 277% 1,256 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 33.7 118% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 121 151% 268 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 224%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 36672120 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 996 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 420191 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2731 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 133 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 61 538181658 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 32 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 996 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 73014444058 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.4% Excellent	Read 148 Write 140 Mixed 135 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.17 80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 100%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 20366488 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 192 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2670972 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2740 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 132 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 62 538247198 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 193 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 77309411358 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75% Very good	Read 135 Write 126 Mixed 121 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.16 62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 50.4 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 43.5 131% 45.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 21.7 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	757x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	113x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	86x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	39x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16