Lenovo 3680VFR

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo 3680VFR (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3680VFR
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121011
Uptime	64.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '17 at 18:09
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	14%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 48.7 1-Core 24.3 2-Core 36.4 26% 36.5 Pts	4-Core 45.1 8-Core 40.2 6% 42.7 Pts	64-Core 45.1 3% 45.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56 10,555 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 223GB free Firmware: SBFZ10.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 72 120260395036 (F1) Unknown 100 100 66	40.7% Average	Read 249 Write 235 Mixed 242 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 7.89 53% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.7 DQ Write 30.9 DQ Mixed 6.95 10% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB 11,127 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: EC2ZB70W Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 77309411329 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 7035 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 4947 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2823 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4294901836 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 141368 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 219044249635 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 27 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	42.1% Average	Read 77.9 Write 69 Mixed 62.7 52% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.16 44% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G3S1067M.M16FKD 2x4GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 3680VFR

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)