Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 3100+ 31 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket A, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Memory 36.1 1-Core 6.7 2-Core 11.8 15% 18.2 Pts	4-Core 13.7 8-Core 18.5 2% 16.1 Pts	64-Core 23.6 2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS541060G9AT00 60GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: MB3VA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.9 9.2 6.3 8.5 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	4.47% Terrible	Read 8.7 Write 7.3 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 6.8 6% 7.57 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.47% Great: 18%
FUJITSU MHT2060AH 60GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 53GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 171 Write 4 Mixed 2.5 41% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 155% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 512 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	4.64% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 1.2 MC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.37 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.4 1% 0.43 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.64% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16