Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FAC
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 01 '20 at 02:09
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	76%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210U 54,859 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 131 2-Core 234 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 569 60% 479 Pts	64-Core 577 36% 577 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1CD1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.29% Terrible	Lighting 7.43 Reflection 10 Parallax 7.75 6% 8.41 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 6.93 Splatting 15.1 10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB 4,206 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 523 420 424 424 424 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 834 Write 667 Mixed 634 SusWrite 440 144% 644 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 69.3 245% 92.3 MB/s	DQ Read 816 DQ Write 765 DQ Mixed 719 559% 766 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 189%
SRT USB 64GB 177 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 60GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 63 23 29 28 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 94.7 Write 77 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 32 92% 71 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.9 122% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 5,397 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 19.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 26.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FAC_X512FA

CPU
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	75x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	26x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	6x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	107x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	35x
INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GBNvmeBench 149%, 6,470 samples	30x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	10x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	27x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	13x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16