Packard imedia S1300

Performance Results

Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 48%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard imedia S1300  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S1300
Memory8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 00:25
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 98.6
49% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 100
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 104
7% 104 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 5.53
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.61
4% 5.81 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 165 165 167 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 192
Write 166
Mixed 177
SusWrite 159
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 19.8
64% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 39.3
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 53.9
46% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. Team--Elite-133300 10GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical imedia S1300 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1300

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $184
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback