Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 22:33
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 693
70% 565 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 116
Parallax 98
84% 106 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 97
Splatting 102
81% 98.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 193 173 199 199 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 376
Mixed 246
SusWrite 197
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 51.4
184% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 246
206% 300 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
305GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 89 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 89.8
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500820AS 1TB
380GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 460 469 458 458 465 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 449
Write 478
Mixed 331
SusWrite 462
317% 430 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 41.2
8,042% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 251
2,586% 315 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 77%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
26GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 20 10 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 132
Write 59.5
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 24.1
86% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.5
218% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback