| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140409 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 29 '20 at 12:18 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.9%
Good
|
57% 93.3 Pts
|
41% 333 Pts
|
24% 393 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
|
34.2%
Below average
|
36% 37.2 fps
|
31% 38.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 401 421 426 453 427 MB/s
|
95.5%
Outstanding
|
97% 430 MB/s
|
139% 48.7 MB/s
|
158% 210 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
766GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 44 50 49 50 50 MB/s
|
21.3%
Poor
|
28% 37.7 MB/s
|
42% 0.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.6%
Below average
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
27% 9.4 GB/s
|
47% 84.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |