Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 4000 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1493
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110719
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '20 at 20:38
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 48.1 33% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 62.5 8-Core 80.5 9% 71.5 Pts	64-Core 79.2 5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% BFG(19F1 111E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.52% Terrible	Lighting 3.17 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 1.22 3% 3.03 fps	MRender 3.71 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.98 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.52% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: LF1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 66 128 145 164 183 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 205 Write 133 Mixed 125 SusWrite 132 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 14.5 51% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 48.2 DQ Write 14.9 DQ Mixed 36.5 26% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 95%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,547 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 21GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.9 3.3 3 3.3 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.71% Terrible	Read 8.8 Write 2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.1 4% 3.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.71% Great: 11%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 5.1 9.1 9.9 9.8 8.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	6.63% Terrible	Read 25.6 Write 4 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 8.2 13% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.63% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 9E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 ID:02 9E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 42GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.63 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	20x
Pentium E5800Intel $58Bench 37%, 8,890 samples	8x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	6x

GPU
B43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 195 samples	19x
B43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 270 samples	15x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	3x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	3x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
SD7SB3Q-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 78%, 2,148 samples	2x

RAM
ID:00 00 AXIOM MEMORY ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 40GBUnknownBench 19%, 3 samples	3x
ID:85 02 PSD32G13332 ID:83 94 991586 38GBUnknownBench 17%, 5 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D 38GBUnknownBench 16%, 9 samples	2x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $109

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16