| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110831 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 28 '20 at 16:06 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.7%
Above average
|
59% 96.9 Pts
|
18% 135 Pts
|
9% 139 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
1.02%
Terrible
|
1% 1.14 fps
|
1% 1.54 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 79 85 82 79 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
62% 84.6 MB/s
|
151% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4 4.7 4.5 4.8 MB/s
|
3.37%
Terrible
|
7% 6.67 MB/s
|
3% 0.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown RM51264BA1339.16FM 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41%
Average
|
39% 13.8 GB/s
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
52% 76.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-MX Builds (Compare 455 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 49x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 33x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 33x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 50x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 26x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |