HP 870-224

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 870-224  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 131
51% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 291
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2212 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 35.8
26% 44.2 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 37.7
40% 50.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 50 12 104 96 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 123
Write 180
Mixed 174
SusWrite 81.1
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 7.9
40% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 33
61% 121 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29%
Great: 86%
Sandisk S240G 1TB
296GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 84 104 101 98 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 94.7
21% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
3% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 125%
General USB Flash Disk 3GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.65% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.1
8% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.6
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-224 Builds (Compare 641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP 870-224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $309
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback