Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FA
Memory	0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190402
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '20 at 13:09
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	17%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 216 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 520 56% 446 Pts	64-Core 514 32% 514 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 16F1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.09% Terrible	Lighting 7.37 Reflection 9.58 Parallax 6.53 6% 7.82 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 14.7 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.09% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 53 57 23 11 67 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,344 Write 871 Mixed 832 SusWrite 108 175% 789 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 61 218% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 634 DQ Mixed 217 240% 395 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 209%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 240GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 119GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 21 21 21 21 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 40.5 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 21.4 8% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 10.6 26% 9.07 MB/s	DQ Read 11.7 DQ Write 16.9 DQ Mixed 13.5 10% 14 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 555GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 33.2 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 21 20% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 180% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 87%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 717GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 34.5 Mixed 33 SusWrite 4.8 35% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 39%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 108GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.55% Terrible	Read 37 Write 35 Mixed 25 SusWrite 0.1 30% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.55% Great: 48%
WDC WD10 PURX-64D85Y0 1TB 147GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.5% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 38 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 0.2 33% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 111% 1.3 MB/s

ST6000VN 0033-2EE110 6TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 5.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 36 36 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 39 Write 37 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 36.5 49% 36 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.1 232% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GB 4,290 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.7% Above average	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17.2 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 17.6 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_X512FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	140x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	107x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	35x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	282x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	9x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	77x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	59x
RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 58%, 2,813 samples	18x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	60x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	49x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16