Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4417U 2,782 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 50.7 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 76.7 36% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 138 16% 125 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610 9,913 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Clevo(1558 2331) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 0.09 1% 1.25 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 3.09 2% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 118 56 63 68 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 351 Write 313 Mixed 11 SusWrite 100 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.3 18% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 92%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 34,988 User benchmarks, average bench 239% 712GB free Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 724 1036 1047 1014 767 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,306 Write 1,148 Mixed 1,009 SusWrite 939 247% 1,100 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 32.2 105% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 457 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 280 196% 259 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB 7,581 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.5% Good	MC Read 19 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22.9 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16