| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 860-019 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 2B4B |
| Memory | 7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151026 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 25 '20 at 20:58 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.3%
Good
|
64% 113 Pts
|
53% 441 Pts
|
34% 557 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
120%
Outstanding
|
120% 174 fps
|
135% 171 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 346 373 363 382 382 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
87% 388 MB/s
|
101% 34.6 MB/s
|
231% 324 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
677GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 170 174 172 174 MB/s
|
79.4%
Very good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
146% 1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 42 41 42 41 MB/s
|
22.6%
Poor
|
28% 37.1 MB/s
|
237% 2.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
67.2%
Good
|
71% 24.8 GB/s
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
42% 94.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 860-019 Builds (Compare 104 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 860-019
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 98x |
| Core i5-6600Intel $132Bench 68%, 80,688 samples | 5x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 56x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $378 |