| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 2000 Notebook PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1854 |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131219 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 25 '20 at 08:06 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.6%
Above average
|
57% 91.7 Pts
|
26% 200 Pts
|
12% 203 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 1854) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
3.5%
Terrible
|
3% 3.91 fps
|
4% 4.76 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 449 447 444 441 428 MB/s
|
90.5%
Outstanding
|
92% 407 MB/s
|
95% 32.5 MB/s
|
173% 290 MB/s
|
|
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
21GB free
Firmware: JA2OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 109 109 107 MB/s
|
60.6%
Good
|
64% 88.4 MB/s
|
121% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KN2M64-ETB ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
51.7%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
52% 77.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 624 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 2000 Notebook PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 126x |
| E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples | 83x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 47x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 206x |
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 91x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $98 |