Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Memory 45.3 1-Core 14.2 2-Core 31 22% 30.2 Pts	4-Core 28.2 8-Core 29.3 4% 28.8 Pts	64-Core 31.2 2% 31.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C648) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RM-SSD-120GB 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 173 176 152 204 187 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.9% Below average	Read 227 Write 125 Mixed 168 SusWrite 172 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 4.8 40% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 98.2 DQ Write 83.8 DQ Mixed 41.4 44% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 1x2GB 655 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 13%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

SSD
N18A 480GBSSDBench 71%, 72 samples	9x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
CS90 0 240GB SSDPNYBench 67%, 400 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	13x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	3x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GBSamsungBench 25%, 274 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16