PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gateway DT71 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Gateway DT71 |
Memory | 7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110720 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Apr 25 '20 at 03:19 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | MAR-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 26,059,658 GHz (avg)
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
INTENSO 256GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 132 69 88 90 49 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
98GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 58 80 80 73 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 86x |
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 12x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 31x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |