Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 23:01
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 167
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 511
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 46.8
28% 39.3 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 25.1
22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 64 72 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 127
SusWrite 70.5
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 18.2
78% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 95.2
72% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
292GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 93 94 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 97.8
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 95
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 100 99 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 92
SusWrite 101
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
91GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 50 57 59 72 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49% Average
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 58.1
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$123
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 156 154 155 158 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 85.3
Write 142
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 159
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
121GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7 7.7 7.9 7.3 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 93.3
Write 12
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 7.3
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
81GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 125 127 130 131 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 95.8
Write 100
Mixed 70
SusWrite 130
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 84%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
123GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 37.1
49% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB
65GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 31.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 34.6
42% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback