Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA530
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 858
84% 686 Pts
64-Core 1029
64% 1029 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 143
Parallax 8.41
6% 52.7 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 15.6
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
133% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 179
Parallax 180
140% 177 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 208
Splatting 128
144% 182 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 133%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA5-8D256 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 335 387 196 277 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,106
Write 788
Mixed 1,040
SusWrite 423
188% 839 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 52.4
177% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 42.1
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 51.1
42% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 128%
Great: 224%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 123 123 123 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 122
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22.1
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 26
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback