Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180627
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '20 at 13:17
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 183 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 473 49% 395 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 77%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 20.4 18% 20.1 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 23 Splatting 17.4 18% 22 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%
AMD FirePro W7100 840 User benchmarks, average bench 30% AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 920 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 47.8 Parallax 54.9 33% 47.8 fps	MRender 46 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 33.8 31% 39.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 233 239 235 237 237 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62% Good	Read 255 Write 242 Mixed 245 SusWrite 234 55% 244 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 28.2 98% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 152 117% 160 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 125%
Toshiba MK6461GS 640GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 365GB free Firmware: 0K SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 74 72 72 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 67.3 Write 77.3 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 72 44% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 420GB free Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 107 107 107 106 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 97.3 Write 100 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 106 70% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 74%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 516GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 142 134 149 162 160 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 150 Write 141 Mixed 38 SusWrite 150 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 107%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 64GB-$23 2,139 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 33GB free, PID 558b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 8.1 0.2 13 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 180 Write 33.3 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 10.8 62% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Mixed 1.8 108% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0N 8x4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 31.8 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16