Apple MacPro3,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro3,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F42C88C8
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080229
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 00:22
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5482
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 23.9
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 87.9
28% 52.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 260
26% 213 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.4% Good
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 85.3
Parallax 86.2
56% 79.9 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 111
Splatting 104
87% 107 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 77 104 93 137 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.8% Below average
Read 150
Write 146
Mixed 143
SusWrite 102
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 14.5
52% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37.2
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 48.5
39% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 126%
WD Re 2TB-$54
204GB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 50 69 85 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 89.5
Write 85.5
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 71
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
772GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 47 59 70 71 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 96.8
Write 92.5
Mixed 63
SusWrite 61.4
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 110%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
6GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.7 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 9.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 10.9
13% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 293
14% 293 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro3,1 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacPro3,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback