Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 80.4 2-Core 171 63% 109 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 438 44% 358 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 75.6 11% 34.7 fps	MRender 98.5 Gravity 76.7 Splatting 74.3 67% 83.1 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 72%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1331) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.64% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 6.69 5% 7.84 fps	MRender 11.3 Gravity 6 Splatting 14.3 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.64% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GB 3,461 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 291 305 299 302 310 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 803 Write 297 Mixed 344 SusWrite 312 97% 439 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 33.2 123% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 492 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 328 263% 374 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 152%
SSD-PM2-1TB 1TB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 345GB free Firmware: S0614B0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 534 318 1023 643 1397 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1233 Write 188 Mixed 208 SusWrite 670 126% 575 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 14.2 93% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 859 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 208 223% 393 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 259%
Kingston DT microDuo 3C 32GB 1,513 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 19GB free, PID 16ae Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 21 20 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 92.7 Write 30.3 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 18.2 38% 37.1 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 37% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FD 2x8GB 959 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.4% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.2 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 19.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	5,981x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	3,465x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	933x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	1,214x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	1,032x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	741x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples	844x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples	755x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	730x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16