Intel GrossePoint Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel GrossePoint
MotherboardIntel GrossePoint Server  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100429
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 13:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 107
58% 89 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 342
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 36.1
31% 34.5 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 34.8
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 132 125 132 123 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.5% Average
Read 204
Write 158
Mixed 156
SusWrite 129
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 20
83% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 152
112% 148 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 87%
WD Re 2TB-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 131 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 29
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 29.3
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GrossePoint Server Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel GrossePoint Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback