Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 102 56% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 173 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800M 1,209 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1521) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.58% Terrible	Lighting 4.37 Reflection 6.69 Parallax 1.69 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 6.81 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 3.83 4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.58% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MMDOE56G5MXP-0VB 256GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 140 142 121 112 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 182 Write 138 Mixed 144 SusWrite 127 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 6.1 30% 8.27 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	228x
Quadro FX 1800MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,209 samples	64x
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	45x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16